Nevertheless one must keep in mind that uniformity of language and behaviour in a peer group can also be a result of peer pressure. Maccoby claims that peer pressure is more distinctive among boys than among girls. Consequently, fitting in a particular peer group becomes a major concern especially for boys. One can suppose that this pressure could be a reason for the different grades of acceptance of non-conforming behaviour.
In contrast to girls, boys are more likely to be excluded when they talk and behave like a so-called sissy. However, one might also argue that maleness has a higher value in society and therefore boys who do not fit are rejected, whereas girls who adopt some kind of male behaviour are not considered being odd, because they confirm to the norm.
While boys can become popular for instance by doing well in sports, girls can do nothing but look, talk and behave the right way. The following chapter will summarize these findings. Since research focuses mainly on same-sex peer groups in order to explain sex differences in communication, there is less information available concerning the language in mixed-sex groups.
From early age on, boys tend to dominate mixed conversation. Like men, who talk more than women in mixed company, boys tend to use longer utterances than girls. One can assume that this is also valid for peer group talk. Boys used more direct forms and sound effects, whereas girls laughed a lot and used forms that show agreement.
Both adapt their linguistic behaviour in mixed conversation, but girls are likely to do it more often and in greater proportions than boys. As mentioned in connection with peer pressure, their can be several reasons for girls being able to style-shift while boys are not able to.
Although girls are said to be more sensitive and mitigating, studies found out that girls are also likely to join when boys are teasing each other. So girls and boys contribute to the reinforcement of gender stereotypes.
Boys tend to play in larger, hierarchically organized groups. Joint activities are the main principle that their friendships are based on. The structure of same-sex peer groups is mainly determined by the activities the group engages in. Lever and Goodwin contrasted the different activities children participate in according to their gender. While sitting inside and talking was an often observed activity of girls, boys tended to play group-games outside, which are mainly based on competition like running or wrestling Tannen : When growing up, the usage of non-standard forms declines among girls and is stable or even increases among boys.
These findings match with the usage of non-standard forms among adults. One can assume that gender norms, which become more significant when children get older, cause this shift. The construction of gender roles in peer groups Term Paper, 13 Pages, Grade: 1,3. K M Kristin Simon Author. Add to cart. Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. Peer pressure 3. Media 5.
Conclusion 6. Bibliography 1. Introduction At the beginning of the semester break, I wanted to seize the opportunity to relax and went to the beach with some friends. Peer groups and language Gender is a social construct: one has to learn to behave and to talk according to the appropriate gender roles, and language takes on a key role in this process. Identification in a peer group One can assert that in a peer group, children learn to get along in a world with people like them, who have similar interests and moral concepts.
American Psychologist, 45, — Marantz, S. Maternal employment and the development of sex-role stereotypes in five-to eleven-year-old girls. Miller, P. Sex-related strategies for coping with interpersonal conflict in children ages five and seven. Developmental Psychology, 22, — O'Brien, M. Development of sex-typed play behavior in toddlers. Parker, J. Social and emotional development in relational context: Friendship interaction from early childhood to adolescence.
Ladd Eds. Roopnarine, J. Sex-typed socialization in mixed-age preschool classrooms. Child Development, 55, — Ruble, D. Social comparison and self-evaluation in the classroom: Developmental changes in knowledge and function. Smith Eds.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Sex stereotypes. Miller Ed. New York: Praeger. Sachs, J. Preschool boys' and girls' language use in pretend play. Philips, S. Tanz Eds. Serbin, L. Effects of peer presence on sex-typing of children's play behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, — Sheldon, A. Pickle fights: Gendered talk in preschool disputes. Discourse Processes, 13, 5— Stein, A.
The effects of sex-role standards for achievement and sex-role preference on three determinants of achievement motivation. Developmental Psychology, 4, — Age and sex differences in children's sex-role standards about achievement. Developmental Psychology, 1, — Spence, J.
Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29— Tannen, D. You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation.
New York: Ballantine Books. Thompson, S. Gender labels and early sex role development. Child Development, 46, — Thorne, B. Sexuality and gender in children's daily worlds. Social Problems, 33, — Zucker, K. Children's appraisals of sex-typed behavior in their peers. Sex Roles, 33, — Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; The next 50 years: Considering gender as a context for understanding young children's peer relationships.
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. Child Development. Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Developmental Psychology. Young children's play qualities in same-, other-, and mixed-sex peer groups.
Mehta CM, Strough J. Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life span. Developmental Review. Gender segregation in childhood. In: Reese HW, ed. Advances in child development and behavior. Vol Orlando, FL: Academic Press; Leaper C.
Exploring the consequences of gender segregation on social relationships. In: Leaper C, ed. Childhood gender segregation: Causes and consequences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; Gender segregated schooling: A problem disguised as a solution. Educational Policy. In press. Exposure to externalizing peers in early childhood: Homophily and peer contagion processes.
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. Boys and girls learn differently! Sax L. Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. New York, NY: Doubleday; The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling.
0コメント